/Parent 15 0 R /TT0 12 Tf The tautological objection that the finder of fact can read the document for itself to see if the quote is accurate is not a legitimate objection but an evasion of the responsibility to either admit or deny a request for admission, unless a legitimate objection can be made or the responding party explains in detail why it can neither admit nor deny the request. Id. The main purpose of Request for Admissions (RFA) is to limit the issues at trial. -73.07 -24 Td T* /Contents [44 0 R 45 0 R 46 0 R] 2.59 -24 Td You need to admit or deny each request. (18)Tj 63 0 obj endobj )25.903 (1)]TJ << /Annots [] Guide: Civil Procedure Before Trial (TRG 2020), 8:1333-1334.1 give these helpful hints on what is unequivocal: Denials on Information and Belief: This is not a proper objection as it is neither straight forward nor complete and is not one of the options listed inC.C.P. (20)Tj -6 -24 Td ( )Tj Ct. Spec. B. /TT0 12 Tf An objection based on privilege must clearly state the particular privilege invoked and may indicate the basis for its applicability. [( Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o i)-1.1 (nc)3.1 (or)2.9 (por)3.9 (a)3.2 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 (s )-2 (b)-20.1 (y)19 ( )-9.9 (r)3.8 (e)4 (f)-7.7 (e)4.7 (r)2.2 (e)4 (n)-9.1 (c)3.9 (e)-5.9 ( G)1.9 (e)3.1 (ne)4 (r)-6 (a)3.1 (l)-2 ( O)2 (bj)-2 (e)4 (c)4.8 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (ons )-2 (1-)1.8 (6 )-9.9 (he)3.1 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( a)3.1 (s i)-2 (f)2 ( )]TJ /Rotate 0 [8] If you fail to answer or object, you're fighting an uphill battle. Q (27)Tj (10)Tj << Request for Admission No. 344.759 55.32 Td T* "Vague and Ambiguous"-- The standard is set forth in Deyo v. Kilbourne (1978) 78 CA3d 771, 783. -6 -24 Td T* T* [( t)-1.9 (hi)-2.1 (s )-1.8 (R)-4.8 (e)4.8 (que)4 (st)-3.8 (;)-2 ( )9 (Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2.8 (a)3.9 (nt)-1.9 (o\222)2.9 (s )-1.8 (a)3.9 (ni)-1.9 (m)-2.9 (a)4.8 (l)-1.9 ( )]TJ << /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] T* /CropBox [0 0 612 792] T* C)-3 (ode)4 ( \247 )]TJ /GS0 gs 710 Buffalo Street, Ste. /DA (/Helv 0 Tf 0 g ) T* endobj f EMC /TT1 12 Tf 19 0 obj BT [(t)-2 (hi)-1.1 (s )-2 (R)-4 (e)3.9 (que)3.2 (st)-3.9 ( )10.8 (a)3.1 (s )-1.8 (wr)5 (i)-1.8 (t)-2.1 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 (n. Mo)-2 (ns)-3 (a)3.9 (nt)-1.9 (o )]TJ T* 4. 3 0 obj 29.4 648.61 Td (4. 21.71 -24 Td Proper Objections A responding party has four options: (1) admit; (2) deny; (3) admit in part and deny in part; or (4) explain why the party is unable to answer. 3 Admit the PLANS do not call for a MILCOR TRIM feature on any sliding glass patio doors detailed therein. endstream /Type /OCG << Objection to a Request Which Seeks Admission of a Matter of Opinion The discovery process can be long and contentious, but it serves a vital role in settling a case. T* endobj T* >> (15)Tj ( )Tj [(D)1.1 (E)-2.1 (N)1.1 (IE)-3.1 (S)-4.9 ( )]TJ In fact, when the discovery process is thorough, the case can settle more quickly, often without even going to court. (17)Tj f (1)Tj Fax: 512-318-2462 /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] << << Fax: 469-283-1787 Authors are responsible for the accuracy of all citations and quotations. /TT0 12 Tf Q A proper objection might include the following language: OBJECTION: This request asks responding party to admit to conclusions, opinions, and statements of subjective intent. /Rotate 0 Q )-3.002 (\222)-4.297 (S)1.697 ( )-1.898 (R)3.203 (E)-14.408 (S)1.707 (P)-10.201 (ON)-2.701 (SES )-3.203 (T)-15.502 (O )-2.902 (P)-10.201 (L)8.504 (A)10.1 (I)-4.197 (NT)-16.305 (I)-5.402 (F)1.707 (F)1.797 (\222)8.695 (S)1.807 ( )-15 (F)1.697 (I)-4.297 (R)-8.705 (S)1.707 (T)-14.408 ( )-2.992 (R)4.297 (E)-4.398 (QU)-1.707 (E)-5.201 (S)2.6 (T)-15.392 (S )-1.506 (F)1.697 (OR)3.504 ( )-2.902 (AD)-1.697 (M)-3.303 (I)-5.402 (S)-9.197 (SI)-3.002 (ON)-1.697 (S)-11.998 ( )]TJ 61 0 obj 0 -686.832 m 100.44 792 0.83 -792 re 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 314.5065 86.2909 Tm (14)Tj /Length 126 0 R The Regents of the University of California, 2019. -72 -24 Td /Names 3 0 R /acircumflex /atilde /adieresis /aring /ae /ccedilla /egrave /eacute /ecircumflex /edieresis 2. [( t)-1.9 (ha)3 (t,)-2 ( af)4 (t)-1.9 (e)4.7 (r)3.1 ( r)-7.8 (e)4.8 (a)3.9 (so)-1.6 (n)-11.7 (a)3.9 (bl)-1.9 (e)4.8 ( )]TJ T* [(R)2 (E)-2.1 (S)-4 (P)10 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (D)2.9 (I)-1.7 (N)-7.2 (G)7.1 ( )-9.1 (P)10.9 (A)2 (R)2 (T)-12.9 (Y)1.1 (:)-6.1 ( )-1050.8 (D)1.9 (e)4 (f)-6.9 (e)3.9 (n)-3.9 (d)-3.2 (an)-4.8 (t)3.7 ( M)4 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (S)-3.9 (A)1.9 (N)2 (T)-2.9 (O)-2 ( C)1.9 (O)-1.9 (M)3.9 (PA)3.2 (N)2 (Y)2 ( )-9.1 ( )]TJ 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.286072 36 cm 411.35 0 Td f (2)Tj 55 0 obj Q /TT0 9.96 Tf 1.0999999 0 0 1.0999999 -6.6222556 -39.599996 cm . /GS0 gs 3 Objection. T* 44.75 0 Td [(3)6.8 (4)6.8 (8)21.806 (1)8.095 (2)6.899 (\\)23.898 (6)21.806 (2)6.899 (6)21.793 (1)5.604 (3)21.806 (8)6.8 (3)8.095 (. /TT0 12 Tf [(t)-2 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( t)-2 (he)3.9 ( st)-3.7 (a)4.7 (t)-2.8 (e)4.8 (m)-1.9 (e)3.9 (nt)-1.9 (s )-2 (m)-3.9 (a)4.8 (de)3.1 ( in)-2 ( t)-4 (he)3 ( c)4 (i)-1.8 (t)-2.1 (e)3.9 (d )-9 (doc)3 (ument oc)3 (c)4.9 (ur)-7.8 (r)3 (e)4.8 (d on )]TJ T* Nonetheless, requests for admissions are not widely used today for two main reasons: One, courts claim that requests for admissions are not truly a discovery tool and have limited their original effectiveness. [(D)1.9 (E)-12.9 (N)2.8 (I)-1.8 (E)-3 (S)]TJ >> However, the code makes it clear that the requirements in responding to Requests for Admissions are higher. /Kids [19 0 R 20 0 R 21 0 R 22 0 R 23 0 R] The request may, without leave of court, be served upon the plaintiff after commencement of the action and upon any other party with the summons and petition or after service of the summons and petition upon that party. /TT0 11.03 Tf )]TJ 67.32 0 Td [(ON)-2.701 (S)-10.301 (A)10.1 (NT)-16.104 (O)-1.898 ( )-3.002 (C)5.201 (O)-1.797 (. 49.55 0 Td /Rotate 0 156.829 43.19 Td 67.32 0 Td (23)Tj When hearing the motion, the court has the power to: . endobj -103.32 -24 Td T* q 60 0 obj Procedure 2033.010, et seq., to plaintiff's First Requests for Admissions ("Requests"). /TT0 12 Tf [(e)4 (va)4.8 (l)-2.7 (ua)4.7 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (ons )-2 (w)1.8 (e)4 (r)-7.8 (e)4.8 ( c)3.2 (ondu)-10 (c)4.8 (t)-2.7 (e)4.7 (d be)3.2 (f)3 (or)-6.1 (e)3.1 ( 1991 a)4.8 (nd ot)-2.8 (he)-5.1 (r)-7.9 ( r)3.8 (e)-6.8 (g)10 (i)-1.1 (st)-4 (r)2.9 (a)3.1 (nt)-1.9 (s of)1.7 ( )-10 (g)10 (l)-21.1 (y)19 (phosa)3 (t)-1.9 (e)-5.1 (-)2.9 (ba)3.1 (se)3 (d he)-6.7 (r)2.8 (bi)-1.9 (c)4.8 (i)-2.8 (de)4.8 (s )]TJ endobj T* Q /Annots [] 48 0 Td q (23)Tj )]TJ [(oc)4 (c)4.8 (ur)3 (r)-7.8 (e)4.8 (d on or)3 ( a)3.2 (b)-9.1 (out)-2.9 ( S)-4 (e)3.9 (pt)-1.9 (e)4.8 (m)-2.7 (be)4.7 (r)3 ( 4, 1985. [(M)-1.8 (onsa)2.8 (n)-10.8 (t)-1.2 (o )]TJ Requests for admissions under Rule 169 may be made "at any time after defendant has made an appearance." Under Rule 85 one form of an appearance by the defendant is by an answer which "may consist of pleas of privilege," etc. <> [(r)3 (e)4.8 (s)-1.7 (t)-2 (a)4.7 (t)-2.7 (e)4.7 (d i)-1.9 (n f)2.9 (ul)-1.9 (l)-2 (. )Tj 9 0 obj /TT1 12 Tf 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 6.11554 36 cm 2020), 9.89 citing Barnett v. Penske Truck Leasing (2001) 90 CA4th 494, 497-499, Unlike sanctions imposed as a penalty for the nine types of discovery misconduct itemized in Code of Civil Procedure section 2023.010, an award of costs of proof for a denial of a request for admission involves the weighing of a number of factors, such as whether the matter denied was of substantial importance; whether there was a reasonable basis for the denial; whether the party making the denial knew or should have known at the time that the requested matter was of substantial importance and was true; whether there were other good reasons for the denial;and whether and to what extent the responding party made a good faith effort otherwise to resolve the matter. The court may find there was no good reason for the failure to admit [Smith v. Circle P. Ranch Co., Inc. (1978) 87 CA3d 267-proof showing that responding party failed to investigate, when the means of obtaining the information were at hand, supports finding there were no good reasons for its denial; hence cost of proof sanctions were justified. (22)Tj /TT0 12 Tf << [(se)2.9 (r)3 (vi)-1.9 (c)4.7 (e)4 ( h)-10.8 (e)4.8 (r)3 (e)3.2 (o)-10 (f)3.8 (\224)4 ( a)3.2 (s )-2 (pl)-4 (a)4 (i)-2 (nt)-2 (i)-12 (f)2.9 (f)3.9 ( a)4 (ss)-2.8 (e)-6.9 (r)3.8 (t)-2.8 (s,)-2 ( b)-2 (ut)-3.9 ( a)4.7 (r)3 (e)3.1 ( du)-9.9 (e)4.8 ( on )-10.8 (O)1.9 (c)4 (t)-1.9 (obe)4.8 (r)3 ( 16, 2017. endstream 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 102.9337315 107.661828 cm (25)Tj BT 37.07 0 Td Lacks Specific Description within Request, Vagueness, Lacks Specificity, or Ambiguity of Request, Information Obtainable from Another Source, Information Equally Available to the Other Party, Request Creates Unnecessary Burden, Expense, or Made for Purposes of Harassment, Personal, Constitutional or Property Rights, Information Unknown or Not in Possession of Responding Party, Request Seeks Admission of a Legal Proposition, Objection to a Request Which Seeks Admission of Hearsay, Request Which Seeks Assertions of Privilege, Civil Suits Arising From Criminal Violations in Texas, Protecting Your Property with a Right of First Refusal in Your Texas Estate Plan, Caring for Your Home When Your Co-Owner is an Absentee, Landlord Liability For Breach of Lease in Texas. /Contents [64 0 R 65 0 R 66 0 R] << 33.452 -24 Td x+ | /Parent 15 0 R /Resources 83 0 R -8.482 -24 Td (23)Tj T* f Raise this objection if the request requires you to do legal analysis and requests a legal opinion. (6)Tj (3)Tj 522 (S.D. endobj C)-3 (i)-2.8 (v. P)-4 (r)2.9 (oc)4.8 (. /TT0 12 Tf The DiscoveryAct doesnot have such strident language forresponding to interrogatories or an inspection demand. endstream T* When Do I Have to Bring a Motion to Compel Written Discovery? /Annots [] Lawyers are often warned about the dreaded consequences of an untimely response to requests for admission of facts. -72 -24 Td << /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Name /ZaDb x+ | (5)Tj [(4)-1.296 ( )]TJ endstream A Request for Admission shortens the lawsuit timelines and reduces the costs involved, although it may be complicated if not handled correctly. (7)Tj Q endobj (24)Tj [(ont)-2 (h or)2.9 ( l)-1.9 (ong)9.1 (e)4.8 (r)2.2 ( )-10 (a)4.8 (ni)-2.7 (m)-2 (a)4.7 (l)-2.7 ( c)-6.1 (hr)3 (oni)-2 (c)3.9 ( t)-1.9 (ox)-9.1 (i)-2.9 (c)4.8 (i)-1.9 (t)-12 (y)29.9 ( st)-3.8 (udi)-2.9 (e)4.8 (s )-1.8 (t)-2.9 (h)-10 (a)3 (t)-1.9 ( i)-1.1 (t)-2 ( ha)3 (s c)3 (onduc)4.9 (t)-2.8 (e)4.8 (d on )-10.8 (g)10.8 (l)-11.9 (y)19 (p)-9 (hos)-1.9 (a)4.8 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 ( )-10.8 (be)4.8 (t)-2.7 (w)2.7 (e)-6.8 (e)4 (n )]TJ REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS UNDER CIVIL RULE 36 Plaintiff, Chow Daun, requests Defendant, Burr Eetos, LLC DBA "Big Boss Burritos", within 28 days after service of this request, to make the following admissions for the purpose of this action only and subject to all pertinent objections to admissibility which may be interposed at the trial: (1) That each of the following statements are true: a . (16)Tj . Nor does it admit the contents of the documents for their truth, unless admitted because of a particular provisions of the Evidence Code such as those pertaining to official documents. /TT0 12 Tf T* [(not)-1.1 ( pr)2 (otec)5.9 (t)-2.8 (e)4.8 (d b)-20.7 (y)20.7 ( t)-1.9 (he)3.9 ( a)3.2 (t)-2 (t)-1.1 (or)-7.9 (ne)-6 (y)20 (-)-6.1 (c)3 (l)-1.9 (i)-1.1 (e)3 (nt)-1.9 ( pr)3 (i)-1.9 (vi)-2 (l)-1.2 (e)-6.9 (g)10 (e)4.8 ( )-9.9 (a)3 (nd/o)-2 (r)1.1 ( t)-2 (he)4 ( w)2.8 (or)3 (k pr)2.1 (odu)-9.9 (c)4.8 (t)-2.8 ( doc)4.8 (t)-1.9 (r)-7.9 (i)-1.1 (ne)3 (. /D 10 0 R -48.829 -12 Td (15)Tj /Font 18 0 R /Type /Page >> /CropBox [0 0 612 792] )25.903 (1)]TJ /Resources 115 0 R >> /TT1 12 Tf uuid:276adb5a-b13f-4138-aeb6-45e793f2ece0 This Blog/Web Site is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. 47.75 0 Td (25)Tj Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objection, Respondents deny. [(M)-1.496 (ON)-2.701 (S)-10.301 (A)10.1 (NT)-16.104 (O)-1.898 ( )-3.002 (C)5.201 (O)-1.797 (. No objection or limitation, or lack thereof, or statement that the Committee will produce documents made in these Responses and Objections constitutes an admission as to the existence or nonexistence of documents or information by the Committee. 58.19 726.6 32.4 -673.2 re Silberman Law Firm, PLLC Copyright 2016 | DisclaimerPrincipal office located in Houston, TX. (7)Tj -39.96 -12 Td Totally inappropriate, and totally expected. /Parent 8 0 R endobj 30.72 0 Td -154.07 -24 Td /Contents [120 0 R 121 0 R 122 0 R] (19)Tj T* A party may respond to an individual request for admission (RFA) by objecting to all or part of it. (1)Tj endstream Q << /TT0 8.03 Tf (6) Motion Regarding the Sufficiency of an Answer or Objection. T* [(R)2 (E)-2.1 (S)-4 (P)10 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (S)-3.9 (E)-2.1 (:)]TJ See C.C.P. A party may serve upon another party a written request for the admission of the truth of any matters, within the scope of 5.3215.324 (relating to general discovery), set forth in the request, that relate to statements or opinions of fact or of the application of law . stream << /dotlessi /lslash /oe /scaron /zcaron 160 /Euro 164 /currency 166 (19)Tj /GS0 gs (27)Tj Xo} C^'(@ /Fm1 Do 7 0 obj 58.19 726.6 32.4 -673.2 re 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 101.3938755 631.298244 cm 5 0 obj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 313.677 86.2909 Tm [( t)-2.8 (ha)4.7 (t)-1.8 ( t)-2.9 (he)4.7 ( c)3.2 (it)-4.1 (e)3.1 (d )]TJ << m)-2 (a)3.9 (l)-1.9 (e)3 ( mi)-4 (c)3 (e)4.1 ( 4029, 4032 )]TJ For example, in a lawsuit about a contract dispute, Party A could ask Party B to admit or deny that Party B ordered 100 widgets from Party A on a given date. W n (10)Tj /Count 20 stream -139.67 -24 Td E-mail: info@silblawfirm.com, Austin Office f 5.350. /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] 802 /Annots [] 2030.280(a). -72 -24 Td q /Length 136 0 R [(i)-1.1 (nqui)-2 (r)-7.9 (y)20.8 ( i)-2.8 (nt)-2 (o t)-2 (he)4 ( i)-2 (nf)3.8 (or)3 (m)-1.9 (a)3.9 (t)-1.9 (i)-12 (on t)-2 (ha)3.1 (t)-1.1 ( i)-2 (s )-2 (kn)-2 (own )1.7 (or)4 ( r)3 (e)4.8 (a)4 (di)-12.7 (l)-12 (y)20.7 ( obt)-2.7 (a)4.7 (i)-1.9 (na)3.9 (bl)-1.9 (e)3.1 (, i)-1.1 (t)-2 ( ha)3.1 (s )-1.8 (no)-1.8 (t)-2.1 ( i)-12.8 (de)3.9 (nt)-1.9 (i)-2 (f)2.9 (i)-1.9 (e)3.9 (d a)4.8 (n)-20.7 (y)20.7 ( 12 )]TJ 36 0 Td )]TJ Privilege inCCP 2033.230(b) appears to refer to the same evidentiary privileges that can be raised to block disclosure at trial. 3. Cal. [(obj)-1.1 (e)3 (c)4.1 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.1 (ons )-2 (a)2.9 (nd gr)3.9 (ounds )-1.8 (t)-3.8 (ha)4.8 (t)-1.9 ( w)1.9 (oul)-1.9 (d r)2.9 (e)3.1 (quire)4.9 ( t)-2.7 (h)-9.2 (e)3.9 ( e)3.1 (x)-9 (c)3.9 (l)-1.9 (usi)-4.9 (on f)3.8 (r)3 (om)-1.9 ( e)3 (vid)-2 (e)2 (nc)4.9 (e)4 ( o)-10.8 (f)3 ( a)-6 (n)-10 (y)20.8 ( st)-3.8 (a)3.9 (t)-1.9 (e)3 (ment o)-10.9 (r)3.8 ( ot)-2.8 (he)4.8 (r)3 ( )]TJ City of Glendale v. Marcus Cable Associates, LLC. [(1)-1.296 ( )]TJ 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.085876 36 cm An objection to an individual RFA may expressly assert that the matter on which the admission is requested is protected work product under CCP 2018.010-2018.080. Motion for Admissions to be Deemed Admittedcan be brought. -177.945 -48 Td /Artifact <>BDC 'o5c2` :c07(hP?q_#|jiEOf -103.32 -24 Td -72 -24 Td 53 0 obj All Rights Reserved. [(r)3 (e)4.8 (pe)4 (r)2.2 (c)4 (u)10 (ss)7.8 (i)-1.9 (o)9.1 (ns)9.8 (.\224)3.1 ( )-249.9 (\()2.9 (MON)3 (G)2 (L)11 (Y)2 (00233281)-10.8 (\))2.9 ( )-249.9 ([)-6.1 (Th)1.8 (is)-3 ( R)-3.9 (e)14.8 (q)9.2 (ue)4.8 (s)8.2 (t)-2 ( i)-1.1 (s )-2 (l)-3 (i)-2.9 (s)9 (t)-1.1 (e)3 (d a)4.9 (s )-1.8 (No)2 (. 614 (S.D.N.Y. 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.691315 36 cm 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.575684 36 cm T* T* /CropBox [0 0 612 792] If it's not a form, the document will typically say Requests for Admission in the title. /Resources 75 0 R 57 0 obj (13)Tj 49.55 0 Td T* endobj T* /TT0 12 Tf Q 238.92 0 Td E-mail: info@silblawfirm.com, Beaumont Office An objection may also be directed to a request that. (22)Tj [(C)-13 (a)3.1 (l)-1.9 (. >> /CropBox [0 0 612 792] T* It is a device that seeks to eliminate the need for proof in certain areas of the case." [Citation.] To)2 ( t)-10.7 (he)3.9 ( e)4.8 (x)-9.9 (t)-2 (e)3.1 (nt)-1.1 ( t)-2 (ha)3.1 (t)-1.1 ( pl)-2 (a)3.1 (i)-1.1 (nt)-2 (i)-2 (f)2.9 (f)2.2 ( su)-1.8 (gg)8.9 (e)3.2 (st)-2.2 (s )-2 (t)-3 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( t)-2 (he)3.9 (r)-7.7 (e)4.7 ( w)2 (a)3.2 (s )-1.8 (no)-1.8 ( )-10.9 (r)-6.2 (e)3.1 (se)2.1 (a)4.8 (r)-7.7 (c)4.7 (h or)3 ( )]TJ T* 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.286072 36 cm And second, the framing of a request for admission is subject to numerous objections, qualifications, and gamesmanship. << x}e}[`Fx)8"N$ *R:{KIwozwr+_=?}^Vov=2c=~y?=H0 o_?77WzIz~I~%9/_>o?iMf{|Or0O?xnp9_hJ~1|z~i~Ku{Vg.qMqZS}ym^ .~O^e /TT0 12 Tf ( )Tj Q . endstream << q /TT1 12 Tf 6. See CEB Section 9:53 citing Hoguin v. Sup. endobj [( t)-1.9 (ha)3 (t )-2 (t)-3 (hi)-2.1 (s )-1.8 (d)8.1 (oc)4.9 (um)-2.8 (e)4.8 (nt)-2 ( w)2 (a)3.1 (s c)-6 (r)2.9 (e)3.1 (a)4 (t)-11 (e)3.9 (d )]TJ /Fm1 Do <>>> >> /Font 129 0 R /TT0 8.03 Tf E-mail: info@silblawfirm.com, Corpus Christi Office [(D)2.8 (E)-3.7 (N)2.7 (I)-1.8 (E)-2.9 (S)]TJ -46.55 -48 Td [(obj)-1.1 (e)3 (c)4.1 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.1 (ons )-2 (a)2.9 (s )-1.6 (t)-2.8 (o c)3.6 (om)-1.7 (pe)4.6 (t)-2.7 (e)-6.1 (nc)3.9 (e)4.9 (, r)3 (e)3.1 (l)-11.9 (e)4.8 (va)3.2 (nc)-5.1 (e)3.9 (, m)-1.9 (a)3 (ter)4.9 (i)-11.9 (a)3.9 (l)-1.9 (i)-2 (t)-2.9 (y)20.8 (,)-10.7 ( pr)2.8 (op)-9 (r)2.9 (i)-1.9 (e)3 (t)-21 (y)19.9 (, a)3.1 (nd a)4.9 (dm)-2.8 (i)-2 (ss)-3 (i)-12 (bi)-2 (l)-1.1 (i)-2 (t)-12 (y)29 (, )-9.9 (a)4.8 (nd a)4 (n)-19.9 (y)19.9 ( a)3.1 (nd )-9 (a)3.9 (l)-1.9 (l)-2 ( )]TJ [(MON)3.8 (G)-7 (L)10.1 (Y)2.8 (04276044-)3 (47, )-10.7 (s)-1.1 (t)-1.1 (a)3 (t)-1.9 (e)4 (s,)-2 ( \223)2.8 (R)-3.7 (e)4.7 (na)3.2 (l)-1.1 ( t)-2 (ubul)-2 (e)3.9 ( a)3.2 (d)-10 (e)-6 (nom)-1.1 (a)3 (s )-1.8 (oc)2.1 (c)4.9 (ur)2.1 (r)-6 (e)3.9 (d i)-1.9 (n . q 51.12 0 Td T* 29 0 obj << 11 0 obj 48.11 0 Td <>/MediaBox[ 0 0 612 792]/Parent 2 0 R /Resources<>/Font<>/Pattern<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI]/XObject<>>>/StructParents 0/Tabs/S/Type/Page>>